HW 5

PLEASE, USE MY SOURCES. IF YOU WON’T USE MY SOURCES, PLEASE DO NOT PLACE A BET ON MY ORDER.

EACH QUESTIONS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 150 WORDS.

Q1. For this discussion, read the articles in Annotation 6 – Fourth Amendment,“Enforcing the Fourth Amendment: The Exclusionary Rule
(Links to an external site.)
,” and Heien v. North Carolina, 603 S. Ct. 13 (2014), and then respond to the following: Based upon your interpretation of the articles, do you think court decisions regarding the application of the exclusionary rule are narrowing its application? Explain your answer in full to support your position. https://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment4/annotation06.html#sthash.t4Cgjjn1

Q2. For this discussion, study the following: Pinder v. Johnson ( 1995) case in the textbook Article, “NRA president James Porter on the job of police: No duty to protect” Then respond to the following: Within the context of the arguments presented in the Pinder v. Johnson ( 1995) case, and the National Rifle Association President James Porter’s article, do you think the U.S. Constitution needs to be amended to provide for an affirmative-duty-to-protect citizens? Explain your position and discuss the consequences that may arise from a change.

https://dailycaller.com/2013/10/23/nra-president-james-porter-on-the-job-of-police-no-duty-to-protect/