Each question needs a response of at least 150 words.
In Discourses of Colonialism, Cesaire famously states:
A civilization that proves incapable of solving the problems it creates is a decadent civilization.
A civilization that chooses to close its eyes to its most crucial problems is a stricken civilization.
A civilization that uses its principles for trickery and deceit is a dying civilization.
The fact is that the so-called European civilization — “Western” civilization — as it has been shaped by two centuries of bourgeois rule, is incapable of solving the two major problems to which its existence has given rise: the problem of the proletariat and the colonial problem; that Europe is unable to justify itself either before the bar of “reason” or before the bar of “conscience”; and that, increasingly, it takes refuge in a hypocrisy which is all the more odious because it is less and less likely to deceive.
Europe is indefensible.
How do you understand his affirmation that Europe is indefensible?
Even looking at contemporary Europe, we see how much the colonial question permeates post-colonial metropoles (Spain, France, UK, Portugal, etc). Considering the readings on the Indigenous Republic in France and Rita’s lecture on racial segregation in Portugal, how has the colonial question (if not the memory of colonialism/racial categories) been mobilized today? (While this week’s reflection assignment will focus on problems and potentials of mobilizing indigenous identity against political, social, cultural, and economic exclusion, feel free to reference it here. Students who opt to do this week’s reflection assignment are welcome to cite discussion boards).
My aim for engaging students in Postcolonialism 101 is to show the global scale of colonialism (if not coloniality). Much literature has been written on what decolonization and liberation entail while many relationships of power derived from colonial exploitation have not changed. Struggles change according to time and context and unique to each community.
What is Fanon’s discussion of national consciousness and national culture?
And here’s a question I am hoping NAMS students can elaborate on to build a class discussion (anyone can answer though!): do you see a disjuncture when it comes to Indigenous peoples? For instance, Corntassel and Witmer (2008) problematize the language of ‘sovereignty and self-determination’ as emphasizing manners distinct from Western definitions of the term. They believe that a traditional indigenous concept of nationhood is “more inclusive and accurate for its emphasis on political and cultural relationships that indigenous peoples maintain with homelands, relatives, clans through their languages, ceremonies and sacred practices, which are all interrelated (xvii). “Peoplehood,” a concept defined by Tom Holm (apud Corntossel and Witmer, 2008: xvi) is also intertwined into their discussion: on one hand, communities have inherent political, economic and cultural powers while, on the other, identity (both collective and individual) is dynamic and interconnected with sacred histories, ceremonial cycles, and ancestral homelands as well as the maintenance of social practices and knowledge systems-–contrary to static political and legal definitions.
There is no singular approach. Last week, students engaged on the question of violence versus nonviolence. Additionally, while Fanon and Césaire leaned towards and utilized Marxism, they also saw a distinction between the European proletariat/class struggles and those of colonized peoples/nations in Africa.
What makes Indigenous struggles different? What can we take from thinkers such as Fanon and Césaire? What are our points of interception with broader anti-colonial struggles? (This can also bring us back to and be used in a critique of Indigenous of the Republic in France)
Plagiarism Free Papers
All our papers are original and written from scratch. We will email you a plagiarism report alongside your completed paper once done.
All papers are submitted ahead of time. We do this to allow you time to point out any area you would need revision on, and help you for free.
A title page preceeds all your paper content. Here, you put all your personal information and this we give out for free.
Without a reference/bibliography page, any academic paper is incomplete and doesnt qualify for grading. We also offer this for free.
Originality & Security
At Homeworkpaper.net, we take confidentiality seriously and all your personal information is stored safely and do not share it with third parties for any reasons whatsoever. Our work is original and we send plagiarism reports alongside every paper.
24/7 Customer Support
Our agents are online 24/7. Feel free to contact us through email or talk to our live agents.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
We work around the clock to see best customer experience.
Our prices are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments. When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service.
Admission help & Client-Writer Contact
When you need to elaborate something further to your writer, we provide that button.
We take deadlines seriously and our papers are submitted ahead of time. We are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed.
Your feedback, good or bad is of great concern to us and we take it very seriously. We are, therefore, constantly adjusting our policies to ensure best customer/writer experience.