discussion

Week 10 Assignment – Comprehensive Project Grading Rubric
Week 10 Assignment – Comprehensive Project Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Word Final Submission: APA formatting
CSLO 1
threshold: 7.0 pts

7.0 pts
Title page, headers, body of paper, and reference page are all properly formatted with a total of 0-2 errors related to APA formatting.

4.0 pts
Title page, headers, body of paper, and reference page contain a total of 3-5 errors related to APA formatting.

0.0 pts
Title page, headers, body of paper, and reference page contain a total of 6 or more errors related to APA formatting. Or assignment was not submitted.

7.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Word Final Submission: 500-word article summary
CSLO 2
threshold: 10.0 pts

10.0 pts
The article summary is at least 500 words in length. It thoroughly identifies the most important points in the article and discusses those points in the student’s own words. It summarizes the article and highlights interesting and important information.

6.0 pts
The article summary does not meet the 500-word length requirement, but still attempts to identify the most important points in the article and discuss those points in the student’s own words. Or the article summary is at least 500 words in length, but it fails to thoroughly identify the most important points in the article and discuss those points in the student’s own words.

0.0 pts
The article summary does not meet the 500-word length requirement and it fails to thoroughly identify the most important points in the article and discuss those points in the student’s own words. Or assignment was not submitted.

10.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Word Final Submission: Topic sentence

3.0 pts
Acceptable
Summary includes a topic sentence that provides the title, author(s), and main point(s) of the selected article.

2.0 pts
Partially Complete
Summary includes a topic sentence that includes only two of the three following criteria: title, author(s), and main point(s) of the selected article.

0.0 pts
Unacceptable
Summary includes a topic sentence that includes only one of the three following criteria: title, author(s), and main point(s) of the selected article. Or a topic sentence was not included in the summary. Or assignment was not submitted.

3.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Word Final Submission: Credible, scholarly source from the Galen Library
CSLO 2
threshold: 3.0 pts

3.0 pts
A credible, scholarly article from an academic journal was selected from one of the Galen Library databases for this assignment.

0.0 pts
Issues are apparent with the credibility of the selected article and/or the source was not retrieved from one of the Galen Library databases. Or assignment was not submitted.

3.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Excel Final Submission: Data sheet
CSLO 1
threshold: 10.0 pts

10.0 pts
At least 12 of the 13 specified tasks for the Data sheet have been successfully completed.

6.0 pts
7-11 of the 13 specified tasks for the Data sheet have been successfully completed.

0.0 pts
6 or fewer of the 13 specified tasks for the Data sheet have been successfully completed. Or the Data sheet was missing from the submission. Or the assignment was not submitted.

10.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Excel Final Submission: Meds sheet
CSLO 1
threshold: 5.0 pts

5.0 pts
All of the 4 specified tasks for the Meds sheet have been successfully completed.

3.0 pts
3 of the 4 specified tasks for the Meds sheet have been successfully completed.

0.0 pts
2 or fewer of the specified tasks for the Meds sheet have been successfully completed. Or Meds sheet was missing from the submission. Or assignment was not submitted.

5.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Excel Final Submission: BMI sheet
CSLO 1
threshold: 5.0 pts

5.0 pts
All of the 5 specified tasks for the BMI sheet have been successfully completed.

3.0 pts
3-4 of the 5 specified tasks for the BMI sheet have been successfully completed.

0.0 pts
1 or fewer of the specified tasks for the BMI sheet has been successfully completed. Or BMI sheet was missing from the submission. Or assignment was not submitted.

5.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Excel Final Submission: BP sheet
CSLO 1
threshold: 5.0 pts

5.0 pts
Both of the 2 specified tasks for the BP sheet have been successfully completed.

3.0 pts
Only 1 of the 2 specified tasks for the BP sheet has been successfully completed. Or both of the 2 specified tasks for the BP sheet were attempted but results contain minor errors.

0.0 pts
Neither of the 2 specified tasks for the BP sheet has been successfully completed. Or BP sheet is missing from the submission. Or assignment was not submitted.

5.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Excel Final Submission: Sheet 5
CSLO 1
threshold: 1.0 pts

1.0 pts
Sheet 5 has been successfully deleted.

0.0 pts
Sheet 5 has not been deleted. Or assignment was not submitted.

1.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PowerPoint Final Submission: Presentation composition & slide count
CSLO 1
threshold: 5.0 pts

5.0 pts
Presentation starts with a title slide, contains at least 8 content slides, and ends with a reference slide.

3.0 pts
Presentation starts with a title slide, contains 6-7 content slides, and ends with a reference slide. Or presentation contains 8 content slides but is missing a title or reference slide.

0.0 pts
Presentation contains 5 or fewer content slides. Or assignment was not submitted.

5.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PowerPoint Final Submission: Theme, layouts, & visual appeal
CSLO 1
threshold: 3.0 pts

3.0 pts
A theme has been implemented using the Design tab across the presentation. At least three layouts have been utilized in the presentation. The presentation looks professional and mostly adheres to best practices in designing PowerPoint presentations.

2.0 pts
A theme has been implemented across the presentation, but there are issues in utilizing various layouts and/or the visual appeal of the presentation.

1.0 pts
A theme has not been implemented across the presentation and/or there are significant issues in the visual appeal and professionalism of the presentation. Or assignment was not submitted.

3.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PowerPoint Final Submission: Required components
CSLO 1
threshold: 10.0 pts

10.0 pts
Presentation includes all 6 of the following required components: text on all slides; notes in the Notes pane; picture, image, or graphic on one slide; additional text box on one slide; copied-and-pasted chart on one slide; a transition to one slide.

6.0 pts
Presentation includes 4-5 of the following 6 required components: text on all slides; notes in the Notes pane; picture, image, or graphic on one slide; additional text box on one slide; copied-and-pasted chart on one slide; a transition to one slide.

0.0 pts
Presentation includes 3 or fewer of the following 6 required components: text on all slides; notes in the Notes pane; picture, image, or graphic on one slide; additional text box on one slide; copied-and-pasted chart on one slide; a transition to one slide. Or assignment was not submitted.

10.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PowerPoint Final Submission: Content & reference slides
CSLO 2
threshold: 5.0 pts

5.0 pts
All content slides contain 3-6 bullets of textual information, and the reference slide features a citation for at least one credible, scholarly source.

3.0 pts
Most content slides contain 3-6 bullets of textual information, but the reference slide does not feature a citation for at least one credible, scholarly source.

0.0 pts
Most content slides do not contain 3-6 bullets of textual information. Or assignment was not submitted.

5.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Revision Summary: 250-word summary

8.0 pts
Acceptable
The revision summary is at least 250 words in length. It thoroughly details the revisions made for the final submission and discusses the importance of revising academic work in the student’s own words.

5.0 pts
Partially Complete
The revision summary does not meet the 250-word length requirement, but still attempts to detail the revisions made for the final submission and discuss the importance of revising academic work in the student’s own words. Or the revision summary is at least 250 words in length, but it fails to thoroughly detail the revisions made for the final submission and discuss the importance of revising academic work in the student’s own words.

0.0 pts
Unacceptable
The revision summary does not meet the 250-word length requirement and it fails to thoroughly detail the revisions made for the final submission and discuss the importance of revising academic work in the student’s own words. Or assignment was not submitted.

8.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Revision Summary: Revision tools
CSLO 3
threshold: 5.0 pts

5.0 pts
The revision summary includes at least two revision tools introduced in the unit and explains how each tool may be helpful in the revision process.

3.0 pts
The revision summary includes only one revision tool introduced in the unit and explains how that tool may be helpful in the revision process.

0.0 pts
The revision summary does not include revision tools or explain how they may be helpful in the revision process. Or assignment was not submitted.

5.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
All Final Submissions and Revision Summary: Spelling, grammar, & mechanics

10.0 pts
Acceptable
All final submissions (Word, Excel, and PowerPoint) and the Revision Summary document contain a total of 0-3 errors related to spelling, grammar, and mechanics.

6.0 pts
Partially Complete
All final submissions and the Revision Summary document contain a total of 4-7 errors related to spelling, grammar, and mechanics.

0.0 pts
Unacceptable
All final submissions and the Revision Summary document contain a total of 8 or more errors related to spelling, grammar, and mechanics. Or assignment was not submitted.

10.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
All Final Submissions and Revision Summary: File type and name
CSLO 1
threshold: 5.0 pts

5.0 pts
All final submissions (Word, Excel, and PowerPoint) and the Revision Summary have been properly submitted as the specified file type and with the specified naming convention.

3.0 pts
All submissions have been properly submitted as the specified file type, but 1-3 files do not follow the specified naming convention.

0.0 pts
One or more of the submissions has been improperly submitted as the wrong file type. Or all submissions have been properly submitted as the specified file type, but they do not follow the specified naming convention. Or assignment was not submitted.

5.0 pts

 

Total Points: 100.0

Homework Paper
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.