evaluation of role
Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop: Group and Individual Evaluation
Submit Assignment
Due No Due Date Points 15 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a file upload Available until Dec 11 at 11:59pm
Course Weight: 15%- See rubric for assessment criteria.
Due Date: One week after workshop by midnight (11:59 pm).
(*mark of 0 if elements not submitted/late without consulting instructor for approval before due date as per policy)
Goal: For the student to critically analyze their own role in the implementation of the Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop.
For the student to critically analyze their group members’ role in the implementation of the Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop.
____________________________________________________________
One week after the Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop has been implemented each CYC student will submit a 4-5 page (not including APA title page) individual evaluation of their role along with the Group Members Rubric and summary. Classroom feedback may be included as it relates to the student’s individual role. Marks will be awarded for the student’s own ability to critically analyze their skill set.
The are two parts to this assignment:
1. Group member assessment-5%
Assessment of all group members participation during planning and implementation of the workshop and psycho-educational write up.
See template here:
Minimize File Preview
2. Self assessment-10%
Critical assessment of skills demonstrated during the planning and implementation of the workshop, therapeutic activity/discussion and psycho-educational write up.
____________________________________________________________
1. Group Member Evaluation (5%)
Complete Group Member Evaluation rubric and write a summary paragraph for each member.
2. Self Assessment (10%)
Critically analyze your role during the workshop/therapeutic activity & discussion. Focus on how you implemented the therapeutic activity and facilitated the small group discussion. Assess all the positive and negative aspects. Analyze your role during preparations for this assignment.
Discuss what you would do the same and what you would do differently if you were to engage in this assignment again (including planning, implementation of workshop, therapeutic activity/discussion.) Provide examples of the modification ideas such as the exact wording you would use or changes to the task. Include a clear statement of your goals and strengths for this workshop.
Provide concrete examples to support your observations and assessment.
____________________________________________________________
Formatting:
Typed in 12 point Times New Roman font
double spaced group members summary and Self Assessment
single space the group members rubric
Include a title page in APA format
Docx or .doc format
Submit one (1) file
Resources for APA referecing:
http://mohawkcollege.ca.libguides.com/CiteYourSources
(Links to an external site.)
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
Rubric
Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop Assignment:Group and Individual Evaluation
Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop Assignment:Group and Individual Evaluation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part One: Group Member Evaluation- Rubric and Summary
4.0 pts
Level 5
Completed on or before due dateSuperior detail, includes rubricExcellent summary of each member’s role in assignmentExcellent example of assignment
3.0 pts
Level 3
Completed on or before due dateAdequate detail, includes rubricAdequate summary of each member’s role in assignment
2.0 pts
Level 2
Completed on due dateSome detailsSome summary of each member’s role in assignment
0.0 pts
Level 1
Not completed or late. Minimal detail, Minimal summary of each member’s role in assignment
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part Two: Self Assessment-Content
4.0 pts
Level 5
Excellent understanding of assignment expectationsExcellent overview of all required areasThoughtful, professional responsesAn excellent example of the assignment
3.0 pts
Level 3
Adequate understanding of assignment expectationsAdequate overview of some required areasAdequate responsesWould benefit from changes to content or structure
2.0 pts
Level 2
Some understanding of assignment expectationsSome overview of few required areasSome responsesWould benefit from significant changes to content or structure
1.0 pts
Level 1
Limited/no understanding of assignment expectations. Overview of few/no required areas. Serious deficiencies or missing elements
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part Two: Self Assessment-Application
5.0 pts
Level 5
Exemplary observationsExcellent linkage to course contentAll points supported by relevant concrete examplesCritical analysis of own strengths and goalsAbove expected criteria
3.75 pts
Level 3
Adequate observations or descriptions includedAdequate linkage to course contentAdequate examples includedAdequate analysis of own strengths and goals
2.5 pts
Level 2
Some observations includedSome linkage to course contentSome examples includedSome analysis of own strengths and goals
1.0 pts
Level 1
Missing observations. No links/limited links to course content. Minimal examples included. Minimal to no analysis of own strengths, goals. Relies predominantly on classroom feedback or sweeping generalizations
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Mechanics
2.0 pts
Full Marks
Well organized.No errors in spelling and or grammarAPA: error-free.Completed in a timely manner.Thoughtful and professional conclusions.
1.0 pts
Half Marks
Generally well organized.Minimal errors in spelling and or grammar.APA citation: errors.Completed in a timely manner.Some conclusions.
0.0 pts
No marks
Poorly organized, does not follow format. Major repeated errors in spelling and or grammar (more than 5 mistakes).APA citation: major errors. Not completed in a timely manner. No conclusions.
2.0 pts
Total Points: 15.0
