reading and respond

Grading Rubric For Writing Assignment Your professor may use a slightly different rubric, but the standard rubric at AUR will assess your writing according to the following standards: Student’s Name: Date: 9/3/2015 ASSIGNMENT TITLE:     Scoring Breakdown CRITERIA A  (100-90) B  (89-80) C (79-70)      D/F (69-50) Student’s Score FOCUS: PURPOSE Purpose is clear Shows awareness of purpose Shows limited awareness of purpose No awareness   MAIN IDEA Clearly presents a main idea and supports it throughout the journal. There is a main idea supported throughout most of the journal. Vague sense of a main idea, weakly supported throughout the journal. No main idea   ORGANIZATION: Overall Well-planned and well-thought out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea, transitions and conclusion. Good overall organization, includes the main organizational tools. There is a sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools are used weakly or missing No sense of organization   ORGANIZATION: Paragraphs All paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with examples and have smooth transitions. Most paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with some examples and have transitions. Some paragraphs have clear ideas, support from examples may be missing and transitions are weak. Para. lack clear ideas   CONTENT Exceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well-developed, supported with specific evidence & facts, as well as examples and specific details. Well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific. Content is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature. Content is not sound   RESEARCH (If assignment includes a research component) Sources are exceptionally well-integrated and they support claims argued in the journal very effectively. Quotations and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet. Sources are well integrated and support the journal’s claims. There may be occasional errors, but the sources and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet. Sources support some claims made in the journal, but might not be integrated well within the journal’s argument. There may be a few errors in APA style.. The journal does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well. They are not cited correctly according to APA style, nor listed correctly on the Works Cited page.   STYLE: Sentence Structure Sentences are clear and varied in pattern, from simple to complex, with excellent use of punctuation. Sentences are clear but may lack variation; a few may be awkward and there may be a few punctuation errors. Sentences are generally clear but may have awkward structure or unclear content; there may be patterns of punctuation errors. Sentences aren’t clear   STYLE: WORD CHOICE, TONE There is clear use of a personal and unique style of writing, suited to audience and purpose; the journal holds the reader’s interest with ease. There is an attempt at a personal style but style of writing may be awkward or unsuited to audience and purpose;  the reader may lose interest in some sections of the journal. There is little attempt at style; reads as flat and perhaps uninteresting in content, which is usually generalized and clichéd. No attempt at style   STYLE: Details and Examples Large amounts of specific examples and detailed descriptions. Some use of specific examples and detailed descriptions.  May have extended examples that go on for too long. Little use of specific examples and details; mostly generalized examples and little description.  No use of examples   GRAMMAR & MECHANICS Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation. A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation, but not many. Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation.  Could also be a sign of lack of proof-reading. Continuous errors   TOTAL SCORE