Week 7 Final Project Presentation
Week 7 Final Project Presentation
Note: This assignment should be in Word and PowerPoint Presentation
PART 1:
Medical Condition Selected: TUBERCULOSIS
Select a medical condition that is commonly seen in your practice as a nurse leader or APRN and then present the following:
1: Demographics,
2: Pathophysiology,
3: Transmission,
4: Screening recommendations, and
5: Current screening tests available.
Part B:
1: Then, discuss the specificity and sensitivity of one test (i.e. PSA, Rapid HIV Testing, CTA, etc.), positive predictive value, problems with the testing (i.e. cost), how the tests are performed, CLIA waiver information, what the results mean, occurrence and implications of false positives and false negatives, limitations of the test, and a final recommendation of whether or not the test should be utilized in clinical practice. APRNs might want to consider discussing how the test can influence clinical decision making whereas nurse leaders may want to consider discussing the financial implications of testing given the epidemiological information presented.
2: APRNs might want to consider discussing how the test can influence clinical decision making whereas nurse leaders may want to consider discussing the financial implications of testing given the epidemiological information presented.
You will give a 15 minute presentation using Kaltura to your peers during Week 7 by posting the recorded presentation. You will also be required to respond to 2 student presentations using the concepts and theories that you learned throughout the duration of the course. Refer to the rubric prior to posting.
Assignment Resources:
· Northwest Center for Public Health Practice Podcast (Links to an external site.) Screening in Public Health.
DNP 7101 Final Presentation Rubric
DNP 7101 Final Presentation Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeaking Skills
5.0 pts
All of the audience can hear the presentation; maintains eye contact with the audience; clear and expressive voice; poised; good posture; no distracting mannerisms
4.7 pts
Most of the audience can hear the presentation; maintains eye contact for most of the presentation; clear voice but not as expressive; adds additional information to the slides
4.4 pts
Difficult to hear; occasional eye contact some mumbling; little to no expression; some distracting mannerisms; reads most slides without adding additional information
4.1 pts
Minimal eye contact; difficult to understand; monotone voice; uncomfortable and uninterested; adds few points but mostly reads slides that are word for word
3.8 pts
Very hesitant with speech; stumbles frequently; difficult to understand; reads work for word from slides without adding additional information
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudience Interaction
5.0 pts
Held audience’s attention throughout; points were made in a creative manner; listened carefully to the audience’s questions and responded directly to each question asked
4.7 pts
Held audience attention for at least 75% of the presentation; polite in answering questions but not always directly
4.4 pts
Hold audience attendance intermittently; facts are presented with little or no imagination; providers length answers occasionally without addressing the question asked
4.1 pts
Responds to questions before the questions are finished; answers to questions are often unrelated to the question asked; looses some attention of the audience
3.8 pts
Completely does not attract the attention of the audience; lacks ability to respond to questions
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisuals
5.0 pts
Visually appealing and easy to read; good use of white space, color, and backgrounds; images and graphics support and enhance content
4.7 pts
Adequate layout but with some fonts, background, and/or colors that are difficult to read
4.4 pts
Difficult to read; cluttered appearance; images are properly sized; some distracting graphics or animations
4.1 pts
Confusing layout; text is extremely difficult to read; too many graphics/sounds that distract from the presentation
3.8 pts
Visuals are dry and boring; lacks any attempt at enhancing the presentation
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
5.0 pts
Presented in a logical sequence; introduction, conclusion, background, and transitions give proper context; key points and conclusions are clear and well developed
4.7 pts
Most information is presented in a logical sequence; clear introduction, conclusion, and transitions; adequate background information; some irrelevant information
4.4 pts
Some problems with sequencing; lacks clear transitions; incomplete or overly detailed; emphasizes less important information
4.1 pts
Little or no organization; difficult to follow; missing or ineffective introduction; confusing or no background; key points are unclear
3.8 pts
No attempt to organize presentation
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubject Knowledge
5.0 pts
Demonstrates in depth knowledge; answers questions with explanations and elaboration
4.7 pts
Demonstrates very broad understanding of the topic; able to answer most questions posed
4.4 pts
Adequate knowledge or most topics; answers questions but does not elaborate
4.1 pts
Superficial knowledge of topic; only able to answer basic questions
3.8 pts
Does not have a grasp of information; cannot answer questions about the subject
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
5.0 pts
Thoroughly but concisely described previous and related work; clearly explains how current work fits into the broader field
4.7 pts
Describes previous and related work; makes connections to current work
4.4 pts
Describes more than a limited amount of other work in the field; makes some connections but lacks others
4.1 pts
Mentions other work done in the field; connections to current work are not as clear
3.8 pts
Unaware of other work done in the field; little or no context for current work
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
5.0 pts
Insightful, strong conclusion supported by evidence; discusses implications and application; recommends future direction for project
4.7 pts
Conclusion is supported by evidence; some discussion of implications and future directions
4.4 pts
Conclusion is adequately supported by stronger evidence; minimal discussion of implications and future plan for implementation
4.1 pts
Conclusion could be supported by stronger evidence; minimal discussion of implications and future plan for implementation
3.8 pts
Conclusion is not supported by evidence; no discussion of implications or future plan for implementation
5.0 pts
Total Points: 35.0
